Medical Humanities Scope and Sequence
- First Year: Limits to Medicine, Christian Worldview of Medicine, Demonised Doctoring, Journal of Biblical Ethics in Medicine, Biblical Medical Ethics: The Christian and The Practice of Medicine ...
Practical Medicine Scope and Sequence
- First Year: Gross Anatomy, Genetics, Embryology, Gross Anatomy Atlas, Biochemistry, Histology, Neuroanatomy, Physiology
- Second Year: Microbiology, Parasitology, Immunology, Pharmacology, Pathology, History and Physical Examination, Behavioral Science, Preventative Medicine, Law and Ethics
- Third Year: Diagnostic and Laboratory Tests, General Surgery, Obstetrics, Gynecology, Pediatrics, Psychiatry, Internal Medicine ( Nephrology and Urology, Pulmonary, Hematology, Cardiology, Rheumatology, Infectious Diseases, Gastroenterology,- Endocrinology)
- Fourth Year: Emergency Medicine,
Anesthesiology,
Neurology,
Family Medicine/Outpatient Medicine,
Radiology,
Geriatrics,
Orthopedics,
Dermatology,
ENT/Otolaryngology, Ophthalmology
Biblically Sound Elder Care
- First Year: Frances André case study, perception management, managed care lexicon & jargon, important healthcare questions, hands-on nursing home internship, economics & ethics of longevity attenuation eugenics, Biblical case for family-based elder care, content & effects of TITLE XIX—GRANTS TO STATES FOR MEDICAL ASSISTANCE .
The REAL Reasons You Want to Avoid Genetically Modified Foods
In this lecture, Jeffrey Smith, author of Seeds of Deception, summarizes the contents of his book, which explains how genetically modified foods cause health problems, and their potential for creating a vast array of unforeseen and surprising illnesses. He also sheds light on how the corruption within the U.S. government, the FDA, and the GMO industry has allowed, and perpetuated, the cover-up.
NaturalNews.com
Originally published February 27 2008Colloidal Silver Has Mainstream Medicine Singing the Blues
by Tony Isaacs (see all articles by this author)(NaturalNews) The recent widespread mainstream media coverage of the "blue man" Paul Karason and his rare skin condition known as Argyria is the latest in a series of largely misleading and sensationalized scare stories about the dangers of colloidal silver turning a person's skin blue.
Although this latest story did not appear to originate from mainstream medicine or the FDA, there is little doubt that they have welcomed it with open arms and have been quick to trot out "medical experts" and past FDA warnings to help "sing the blues" about colloidal silver. The truth is that mainstream medicine has a very good reason to cry long and loud about colloidal silver, because it does represent a very real danger – a danger to the huge profits of the pharmaceutical industry's patented antibiotics. More
Theft from Mother Nature
by Shane Ellison, M.Sc.,
Author Health Myths Exposed
http: www.healthmyths.net
The design of prescription drugs is guided by knowledge obtained from plant –based predecessors, which are commonly sold as nutritional supplements. Drug companies obfuscate this. They like people to think drugs are the only option and that they intuitively invent them out of thin air.
Mother Nature has traditionally been the guide for the design and synthesis of new drugs. Check out these examples. Ritalin and many other stimulants are knock-offs of the active ingredients found in ma huang AKA ephedra. Ma huang is a safe and effective stimulant that increases mental focus.
Cholesterol-lowering drugs known as statins are knock-offs of the natural ingredient found in red yeast rice. Akin to the drugs, red yeast rice can dangerously lower cholesterol levels.
Aspirin, the drug that your doctor tells you to take EVERYDAY, is a knock-off of the active ingredient found in white willow bark. White willow bark is a safe and effective pain reliever.
Baicalein, an anti-cancer drug used among those who suffer from leukemia, is a knock-off of the active ingredient found in the roots of Chinese skullcap (Scuterllaria baicalensis). Chinese skullcap is a safe and effective natural cancer fighter that induces cell suicide (apoptosis) among leukemia-derived cancer cells.
The tiny family of prescription pain killers used by doctors are knock offs of the natural ingredients found in opium (opium is far safer than current fast acting drug knock-offs).
Doctor v. Veterinarian |
FDA Tyranny to Become Law
FDA management is in bed with Big Pharma and this new legislation makes matters significantly worse through the creation of the Reagan-Udall Foundation for the FDA. This new entity places the FDA in charge of drug design, drug patents, drug licenses, and the creation of new marketing entities/companies. Such a relationship with private industry is an unprecedented conflict of interest, totally at odds with drug safety.....
http://www.newswithviews.com/Richards/byron38.htm
by Byron Richards, CCN
Stinky Sulfur Awards
Award Recipient #7 - Texas State Board Of Medical Examiners (TSBME)
The TSBME has made it loud and clear: They work for the drug industry and their cohorts, the medical insurance racket. Patients seem to come last, if that. The below letter from Dr. David Sheridan shows succinctly how medical doctors are threatened if they don't adhere to Western Medicine's push for prescription drug addiction. This stinks. And I wish more medical doctors had the integrity to stand up to such injustices.
Texas State Board; Great Protector…. but Protecting a Flawed Standard?
By: David P. Sheridan, MD
On three occasions, I have had the dubious privilege of reading testimony by TSBME “experts’ against a physician who, in their eyes, was guilty of some alleged practice impropriety. In all three cases, I found the report to be superficial and flawed. It left me wondering; “Who are these people and where/how were they trained?” The most egregious incident of which I am aware is the recent case of Dr. Bill Rea.
A personal friend, Dr. Rea is one of the most gifted physicians I’ve ever known. All indications are that the anonymous complaint against Dr. Rea was filed by an insurance company from New York. The patients involved were NY residents. They loved Dr. Rea and were appalled that a complaint had been filed with respect to their cases. The attorney for the TSBME told Dr. Rea’s attorney that it did not matter what evidence was presented to the “Bored”, they intended to take his medical license. This was before what is known as the Informal Show Compliance and Settlement Conference (ISC). The Board evidently did not want to take any chances of being confused by the facts and made their decision ahead of time. What of the right to due process, you ask? What about it indeed! If not based on the facts, what is the premise upon which the decision was made? Was there a premise at all or just an agenda?
The recurrent theme in these reports is that the doctor in question did not meet the “Standard of Care”. A question, then if you please; what is the standard to which we are held? Who sets this standard and from whence does it come?
Presumably, the standard of care is established by what a reasonably prudent physician with comparable training and experience would do under similar circumstances. Superficially, this seems reasonable enough. In practice, however, the application of this concept approaches the Draconian. Such so-called “experts” are chosen by the TSBME and their names are secret. The “Star Chamber” tactic employed by the board leaves the defendant unable to face any of their accusers. As to the actual qualifications of the Board’s “experts”, we are merely to accept the Board’s word that they are indeed expert and similar in training and experience to the defendant.
So what is the so-called standard of care in Texas? Presumably, it is pretty much the same as that of the rest of America. So what do we know about this standard? Well, a brief review of traditional medical literature will tell us. It isn't pretty. The wealthiest nation in the world spends the most on medical care and is much sicker for it.
According to JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association, FDA drugs used in FDA approved fashion kill over 100,000 people every year. This figure does not include prescribing errors, just good old “standard of care” medicine. The rest of the story is even more sobering. Including unnecessary surgery, hospital errors and hospital acquired infections there are 225,000 deaths per year in this country caused by our medical system! Our beloved standard of care is the third leading cause of premature death in the nation. This is the precious standard to which doctors are held. The World Health Organization (WHO) evaluated the standard of care of 25 industrialized nations. The United States ranked 15th. This is the precious standard to which we are held.
As I mentioned before, FDA approved drugs are killers. Look back over the years and we find this is nothing new. Over the last 27 years, half of all FDA approved drugs have been recalled for killing patients. No matter from what the direction, using “standard of care” as a measure of a physician hypocritical at best. At worst, it reveals a dark intent to knowingly protect a system grown malignant by greed and corruption. Now, evidently the TSBME stands ready and eager to serve an out-of-state insurance company with no interest as to how well the patients fared under Dr. Rea’s care.
Should you think this is an isolated incident, think again. Bill Rea is past president of the Pan American Allergy Society. It turns out that 6 of 9 past presidents of this organization who reside in Texas have been attacked by the board. The odds against this being a targeted effort must be staggering. The increase in attacks may be for good reason. Conventional medicine is running scared. My own experience with patients supports this conclusion, as public opinion is definitely on our side. Our guests used to be concerned upon learning that their conventional doctor may not approve of our treatment methods. Those days are all but gone. For the last 2-3 years, guests express indifference towards, if not outright contempt for the opposition expressed by the conventional front. The public has had it with the “one-size-fits-all”, fast food conventional medical mentality. Sadly, money talks and the conventional front is digging in.
Heaven forbid that doctors like Dr. Rea hold themselves to a higher standard. Even worse, Heaven forbid their standard not be based upon FDA approved drugs. How many people must die to further political careers and drug company/insurance company profits? How long should organizations like the TSBME be allowed to act in secret and beyond oversight? To what standard are they held? For whose protection do they exist? Proceedings should be open and recorded as in any just system. Just as important, TSBME members must reveal financial or other ties they may have with corporate entities such as pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies or any other potential conflict of interest. Transparency must replace the current cloak of secrecy. We desperately need leadership with vision not hidden agendas.
Doctors, other medical professionals and the public must wake up! It is time to step up. It is time to speak out. It is time to fight for our lives and the lives of our patients. It is time to set a new standard.
See more Stinky Sulfer Awards via http://www.thepeopleschemist.com
"The Hebrew Republic" by Petrus Cunaeus is a book that deals with the various ministries of the OT Levites and suggests that law and medicine should be ministries of the church and paid for by tithes. How would this work practically today?
"Your Money for Your Life," featuring Kent Masterson Brown CATO Podcast. Nationalized socialism in healthcare leads to outlawing the use of your own money to buy healthcare and then people can not obtain the health care they want.
Here is the article from Dr. Payne published in the last Concourse News for your reference, and here are his websites:biblicalworldview21.org and bmei.org Here are just a few questions to get you and your family thinking about how the Bible applies to health and medicine: True or False? 1. The health care worker must have a thorough knowledge of the Bible practically applied to his personal and professional life? 2. The Bible conflicts with medical science when both are correctly understood? 3. The Bible is the final authority for health, medical care, and medical ethics. 4. Medical ethics should be determined by the desires of the patient, the ethics of a medical organization, current medical practice, technical feasibility, or governmental legislation. 5. God created man distinct from animals as a unity of non-material (non-physical) and material (physical) components that both affect the presence or absence of health. 6. Man can be treated medically as simply a bio-chemical entity. 7. The worth of an individual person is determined by his creation in the image of God. 8. The worth of a person can ever be determined by his quality of life or his usefulness to society, and the health of collective humanity necessarily supercedes the health of the individual. 9. Government or health care institutions have the authority to prevent the treatment of the spiritual dimension of illness. 10. The health care worker should receive payment for his services as determined by the free market. Here is the link to the Concourse Health Professionals and Services page with more related references. |
Psychiatry is labeling everyone for profit!
Psychiatry the fraud
The Master List of (Imaginary) Mental Disorders








